Automatic Three-Year Review of Economically Significant Regulations
December 8, 2022 11:29 AM to All Senate Members
Circulated By

Senator Michele Brooks
R Senate District 50
Memo
I will be reintroducing Senate Bill 126 from last session, which will provide for a one-time automatic review of all economically significant regulations established after the effective date of the bill’s enactment.
An “economically significant regulation” is defined as one that has a fiscal impact on the Commonwealth, its political subdivisions, or the private sector that exceeds $1 million annually. After the regulation has been in effect for three years, the agency promulgating the regulation must review it and then report to the Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC) the following findings:
Senate Bill 126 was previously cosponsored by Senators Argall, Martin, Stefano, Phillips-Hill, Hutchinson, J. Ward, Gordner, K. Ward, Pittman, Mastriano and Aument. This legislation passed the Senate but was not considered by the House by the end of the legislative session.
Please join me in cosponsoring this legislation. This bill will be an important step in ensuring that inefficient and ineffective regulations are repealed in a timely manner, in order to avoid incurring unnecessary costs to the Commonwealth and its citizens. Please do not hesitate to contact my office with any questions.
An “economically significant regulation” is defined as one that has a fiscal impact on the Commonwealth, its political subdivisions, or the private sector that exceeds $1 million annually. After the regulation has been in effect for three years, the agency promulgating the regulation must review it and then report to the Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC) the following findings:
- The status of implementation;
- The effectiveness and efficiency of the regulation, as well as any steps taken to increase efficiency in implementing it;
- The direct and indirect cost of the regulation, and whether the fiscal impact was over-estimated or under-estimated, as well as the nature of any public comments on the regulation;
- Whether the current laws of the Commonwealth require the regulation’s repeal or amendment; and
- If the promulgating agency is considering changing the regulation, and whether the regulation itself is still needed.
Senate Bill 126 was previously cosponsored by Senators Argall, Martin, Stefano, Phillips-Hill, Hutchinson, J. Ward, Gordner, K. Ward, Pittman, Mastriano and Aument. This legislation passed the Senate but was not considered by the House by the end of the legislative session.
Please join me in cosponsoring this legislation. This bill will be an important step in ensuring that inefficient and ineffective regulations are repealed in a timely manner, in order to avoid incurring unnecessary costs to the Commonwealth and its citizens. Please do not hesitate to contact my office with any questions.
Legislation
Document - Introduced as SB 190
Last updated on December 8, 2022 11:30 AM
Automatic Three-Year Review of Economically Significant Regulations
December 8, 2022 11:29 AM to All Senate Members
Circulated By
BROOKS
Memo
I will be reintroducing Senate Bill 126 from last session, which will provide for a one-time automatic review of all economically significant regulations established after the effective date of the bill’s enactment.
An “economically significant regulation” is defined as one that has a fiscal impact on the Commonwealth, its political subdivisions, or the private sector that exceeds $1 million annually. After the regulation has been in effect for three years, the agency promulgating the regulation must review it and then report to the Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC) the following findings:
Senate Bill 126 was previously cosponsored by Senators Argall, Martin, Stefano, Phillips-Hill, Hutchinson, J. Ward, Gordner, K. Ward, Pittman, Mastriano and Aument. This legislation passed the Senate but was not considered by the House by the end of the legislative session.
Please join me in cosponsoring this legislation. This bill will be an important step in ensuring that inefficient and ineffective regulations are repealed in a timely manner, in order to avoid incurring unnecessary costs to the Commonwealth and its citizens. Please do not hesitate to contact my office with any questions.
An “economically significant regulation” is defined as one that has a fiscal impact on the Commonwealth, its political subdivisions, or the private sector that exceeds $1 million annually. After the regulation has been in effect for three years, the agency promulgating the regulation must review it and then report to the Independent Regulatory Review Commission (IRRC) the following findings:
- The status of implementation;
- The effectiveness and efficiency of the regulation, as well as any steps taken to increase efficiency in implementing it;
- The direct and indirect cost of the regulation, and whether the fiscal impact was over-estimated or under-estimated, as well as the nature of any public comments on the regulation;
- Whether the current laws of the Commonwealth require the regulation’s repeal or amendment; and
- If the promulgating agency is considering changing the regulation, and whether the regulation itself is still needed.
Senate Bill 126 was previously cosponsored by Senators Argall, Martin, Stefano, Phillips-Hill, Hutchinson, J. Ward, Gordner, K. Ward, Pittman, Mastriano and Aument. This legislation passed the Senate but was not considered by the House by the end of the legislative session.
Please join me in cosponsoring this legislation. This bill will be an important step in ensuring that inefficient and ineffective regulations are repealed in a timely manner, in order to avoid incurring unnecessary costs to the Commonwealth and its citizens. Please do not hesitate to contact my office with any questions.
Document
Introduced as SB 190
Last Updated
December 8, 2022 11:30 AM
Generated 03/23/2025 02:52 PM